The government launched its telecom/broadcast review yesterday and the discussion immediately turned to Internet and Netflix taxes. Despite the wide array of issues ranging from net neutrality to the CBC before the newly established panel, for many the focus of its recommendations and the government response will ultimately come down to whether there are new Internet regulations and taxes established to support the creation of Canadian content.
Canadian Heritage Minister Melanie Joly and Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains both commented on the issue, suggesting divergent priorities. Bains told the Toronto Star:
For me, a critical issue is making sure that Canadians do not pay more. This is really around quality, coverage and price, and price is something that Canadians have expressed as a concern.
Joly’s emphasis was not on consumers, but rather contributions from any service connected to the Internet, telling the Wire Report:
All players in the system must contribute. So if you’re part of the system, you have to contribute, and there’s no free ride. But that can’t be at the expense of Canadians.
I have argued that there is no need for new Internet taxes to fund Cancon as there is no Canadian content emergency. The Canadian production industry has experienced record investment in recent years, demonstrating that Joly’s initial instinct to focus on export markets and the discoverability of Canadian content was the right approach. But after facing criticism over a Netflix deal that brought hundreds of millions into the industry, Joly has been consistently inconsistent on the Internet tax message, fomenting uncertainty and lingering suspicions that the end-game is now Internet taxes and regulation.
In fairness, it should be noted that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been steadfast in opposing new Internet taxes. For example, when the Canadian Heritage committee recommended an Internet tax seemingly out of the blue last June in its report on local media:
The Committee recommends to expand the current 5% levy for Canadian content production on broadcasting distribution undertakings to broadband distribution.
Trudeau unequivocally rejected the recommendation an hour later while the committee was still presenting its findings at a press conference:
We respect the independence of committees and Parliament and the work and the studies they do, but allow me to be clear: We’re not raising taxes on the middle class – we’re lowering them. We’re not going to be raising taxes on the middle class through an Internet broadband tax. That is not an idea we are taking on.
Months later, the official government response explained the policy rationale for rejecting Internet taxes:
The Committee’s recommendation to generate revenue by expanding broadcast distribution levies so that they apply to broadband distribution would conflict with the principle of affordable access. The open Internet has been a powerful enabler of innovation, driving economic growth, entrepreneurship, and social change in Canada and around the world. The future prosperity of Canadians depends on access to an open Internet where Canadians have the power to freely innovate, communicate, and access the content of their choice in accordance with Canadian laws. Therefore, the Government does not intend to expand the current levy on broadcast distribution undertakings.
Despite clear messaging from the Prime Minister, for the past year Joly has sent mixed messages about Internet taxes. Her launch of Creative Canada last September assured Canadians there would be no new taxes:
When it comes to content, Canadians want choice. But we know that access and affordability of Internet and wireless are real issues for many. Broadband coverage is uneven across the country. We pay some of the highest rates in the world. Our government won’t increase the cost of these services to Canadians by imposing a new tax.
A week later, Le Devoir reported that Joly was targeting Internet providers, noting Joly’s tweet to Pierre Karl PĂ©ladeau asking why Videotron wasn’t paying cultural contributions and comments that a new system would be developed to ensure those benefiting from the Internet provide cultural funding.

Melanie Joly tweet, 1 October 2017, https://twitter.com/melaniejoly/status/914635791313272832
In February, Trudeau was asked about making “web giants pay their fair share” during Question Period in the House of Commons. His response:
We explicitly promised in the 2015 election campaign that we would not be raising taxes on Netflix. People may remember Stephen Harper’s attack ads on that. They were false. We actually moved forward in demonstrating that we were not going to raise taxes on consumers, who pay enough for their Internet at home.
Yet two days later, Joly was asked the same question, but offered a different response:
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister was very clear on this. We made a promise and we plan to keep it. That being said, we recognize that in the long term we need to develop a comprehensive solution for taxing digital platforms. We are not going to take a piecemeal approach.
In fact, just yesterday, Joly’s press release on the review panel included the quote “the principle guiding this review is clear: if you profit, you contribute—there is no free ride.” Hours later, a department official qualified the quote by telling Cartt.ca that “the government will reject all proposals that increase what Canadians pay.” The same tension arose during a Joly appearance at the Senate in the afternoon, where she alternately told Senators “all the players who benefit from the system, including Internet giants, must contribute. There are no free passes” and “I will also be making affordable Internet access a priority.”
When asked how to reconcile the competing goals of mandated contributions with no additional consumer costs, Joly responded to the Wire Report that “the panel will find solutions.” The panel led by Janet Yale features some of Canada’s leading experts, but they are largely lawyers, not magicians. The simple reality is that for all the talk of cost-neutral schemes, forcing Netflix to pay its share, or demanding that ISPs contribute to the system, if Joly mandates new Internet taxes, basic math suggests Internet costs will go up and Canadian consumers will ultimately foot the bill.
The post Math Not Magic: If Melanie Joly Mandates Internet Taxes, Consumers Will Foot the Bill appeared first on Michael Geist.
Comments
Post a Comment